Now that the LPNM has apparently attained “major party” status for the second time, the LPNM will most likely be awash in those of all stripes who expect the Party and its members to toss the Non-Aggression Principle in the trash because, well, how else can we support the legislation that they advocate?
Not only that, but many of these people will insist on being LPNM candidates, party officers, what have you, because after all, no one truly understands how trashing the NAP will bring us to liberty in our lifetimes like they do.
I propose that while they might be very willing to delegate that initiation of force to the public sector, they probably don’t have the stomach to do it personally.
Thus I suggest that we offer them knives, or clubs, or whatever, and let them demonstrate that they do indeed personally have what it takes.
This scene from Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight (2008) comes to mind —
I have no intention of starting a civil war in the LP’s ranks (one could argue that one has been going on since 2006), but let’s head this off before we end up like the Reform Party of 2000, from which I had read accounts of actual physical fist-fights on the business floor of their national convention.
Especially when I keep seeing articles that the entire county may be headed for a civil war itself. NOT the sort of thing that happened between 1861 and 1865, but more like The Troubles in Northern Ireland, with a rural vs. urban component to it for kicks.
In either case, we of principle aren’t going away. Nor will we voluntarily disarm ourselves.
- If there are any other state affiliates of the LPUSA facing similar circumstances, I have no problems with them adapting this proposal to their purposes.
- The LPNM briefly attained “major party status from 1999 to 2001 after Maurice McDonald ran for State Land Commissioner in 1998 and recieved about 9% of the total votes cast, which was equivalent to 5% of the votes cast in that year’s gubernatorial election.
- Libertarian Party Audacious Caucsu
- Reposted –